安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题








Another way to deal with bureaucracy is too not increase your capcity, but rather decrease the provinces that you need to manage. If a province has some land controlled by nobles and there is at least light serfdom, those nobles will govern the land for you and it won't contriubte to the provinces that need buercratic management. So try to pick the noble options when you take provinces, my large empires tend to have light serfdom in almost every province as this greatly decreases the amount of provinces your bureaucracy deals with. However I'm not too sure about the bad effects from having a high noble privilege, I haven't seen any directly though I'm sure there must be some drawback to it. I'm thinking it might decrease meritocracy, as this would make a lot of sense. I wish the whole beauracracy, land ownership and serfdom mechanics were explained better, as it seems like a really intruging system.