安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题








The inefficient bureaucracy modifier triggers when current governance falls below required governance; usually the fastest way to correct that is to boost autonomy in some provinces and the next calculation cycle should push your required governance down below the threshhold.
What nation and situation did you run into this in? We've tried to benchmark it such that it only limits your ability to simply take all land everywhere for the crown when conquering though I've occasionally run into it restoring Byzantium simply because of the speed at which one can reclaim those cores in the early game.
Are you sure it's not because of separatism? Territorial cores cannot be established until separatism dies off. Also note that values have been changed for provinces such that not being a core no longer makes the province almost inherently worthless.