安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题








1: Companion cosmetics make the game (or games in general) more lively
2: It opens the gate to more possibilites (first opened by the botler), more cosmetics slots
Now, my question for you is: Would you actually consider any point to be good, or would call of them bad simply to in the right about wether or not this item should be added?
I'm all for more bodygroups so cosmetics like the pathfinder will actually look good and not make the characters arms inflated.
Adding more bodygroups is hardly possible as I'm pretty sure you can make a cosmetic to go just about anywhere.
I also don't understand the hate for the botler when robro 3000 exists. I also don't understand how on Earth did some people get confused by it. I know some tought it had collision, even though it though it doesn't make sense for cosmetic items to have collision beyond making them not clip through the map.