安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题








Settings-related QoL updates will be implemented at some point, though. These are good. Missions, NPCs and everything else gameplay-related is already planned wayyyy ahead and we don't want people to waste their own time writing things that we are not going to implement anyway, either due to time-constraints or flaws in design (e.g. Control Point is actually a scrapped mission type, because how do you expect to re-take, much less keep multiple control points on gm_bigcity in singleplayer?)
No offense, we understand people have ideas, but we have our own design document and we have already thought everything through in advance. The reason gamemode isn't getting much new content yet is because we're focusing entirely on QoL/bugfixes/stability updates right now, not because we have no ideas. On the contrary, we have lots of ideas, many of them have been already discussed during 1 year of development, many were scrapped, many were expanded, etc.
Thanks for your input, but really, if I kept this thread unlocked, we would be inviting a lot of people to just waste their time, I hope you understand.