安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题








Both push historical narratives into the flow of CK3 when doing an 867 start.
Is there anything that will cause a crash if using both.
No, there's nothing that will cause a crash if you use both. I, in fact, use both on a regular basis myself.
You do need to pick between the mods for the various sections where they overlap, however, as I mention above.
- Turned a bit harder for a character to vassalize other one peacefully (!)
(!) - Specially for non de jure vassals, but overall it is a bit harder to vassalize diplomatically
- Introduced Diplomacy of the proponent as a modifier (+/-) to the "Vassalize Character" interaction
Would this necessarily make your events impossible or just less likely to work out? Thanks in advance )
Well, chances are that part of the files would conflict between the two mods - so you're getting one or the other. Which would take preference, I'm not sure. It might depend on the loading order you put them in.