the

引用自 Willi：

Can't you realize that uploading content that costs money for free is illegal?

he will make it all pink checkers if u dont have css

引用自 Willi：

Can't you realize that uploading content that costs money for free is illegal?

i own css, i want content with css in it

引用自 Willi：

Can't you realize that uploading content that costs money for free is illegal?

bro nobody on the internet cares about if what they are doing is illegal
otherwise piracy wouldnt exist online

引用自 Nathan：

引用自 Willi：

Can't you realize that uploading content that costs money for free is illegal?

bro nobody on the internet cares about if what they are doing is illegal
otherwise piracy wouldnt exist online

Everyone cares
There is a reason why rules exist.
VALVe have right to remove your content and even restrict your account if you do something illegal.

Please go a head and advertise something illegal and watch your account get deleted.

引用自 Willi：

引用自 Mememan97A：

i own css, i want content with css in it

If you have CS:S mounted, then why do you need CS:S content in the map? I think that is pointless.

Please read the comment you just posted before typing.

He basically says:
"I have the Game,i want a version of this map with CS:S textures"

引用自 Willi：

引用自 Lady Alcina Dimitrescu：

Please read the comment you just posted before typing.

He basically says:
"I have the Game,i want a version of this map with CS:S textures"

I still don't get this, because when CS:S is mounted, then the player gets cs_assault with obviously CS:S content, and works perfectly fine in Sandbox, so I don't know why does this user wants CS:S content in gm_assault_sandbox.

just like how some people subscribe to variations of gm_flatgrass and construct. i would prefer to play on a different variation of cs_assault for sandbox. besides, the first of the css maps he worked on was gm_port sandbox which included new additions and fixes. i would like to see these types of maps but with their css artstyle retained

引用自 Mememan97A：

引用自 Willi：

I still don't get this, because when CS:S is mounted, then the player gets cs_assault with obviously CS:S content, and works perfectly fine in Sandbox, so I don't know why does this user wants CS:S content in gm_assault_sandbox.

just like how some people subscribe to variations of gm_flatgrass and construct. i would prefer to play on a different variation of cs_assault for sandbox. besides, the first of the css maps he worked on was gm_port sandbox which included new additions and fixes. i would like to see these types of maps but with their css artstyle retained

Well, this is just the same map, but without Css required.

引用自 Willi：

引用自 Lady Alcina Dimitrescu：

Please read the comment you just posted before typing.

He basically says:
"I have the Game,i want a version of this map with CS:S textures"

I still don't get this, because when CS:S is mounted, then the player gets cs_assault with obviously CS:S content, and works perfectly fine in Sandbox, so I don't know why does this user wants CS:S content in gm_assault_sandbox.

not everyone has css lil bro

引用自 Nathan：

引用自 Willi：

I still don't get this, because when CS:S is mounted, then the player gets cs_assault with obviously CS:S content, and works perfectly fine in Sandbox, so I don't know why does this user wants CS:S content in gm_assault_sandbox.

not everyone has css lil bro

did you not even understand what i wrote?

引用自 Willi：

引用自 Lady Alcina Dimitrescu：

Please read the comment you just posted before typing.

He basically says:
"I have the Game,i want a version of this map with CS:S textures"

I still don't get this, because when CS:S is mounted, then the player gets cs_assault with obviously CS:S content, and works perfectly fine in Sandbox, so I don't know why does this user wants CS:S content in gm_assault_sandbox.

Basically a version which contains CS:S textures instead of default Half-Life 2 textures.
While maintaining this map, and perhaps making a new reworked version of this map with CS:S textures.