安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题








Q1.
You mentioned about the 'additive' defensive repeatable techs, which can be ovelapped with existing multiplicative one, and can be applied together with damage AND fire rate RTs. But I won't apply it for several reasons.
1. That makes too many RTs.
2. Removing fire rate RTs is not only to solve the imbalance of the offense/defense RTs, but also to make fire rate bonuses more important and valuable. In Stellaris, fire rate bonus is used commonly as a 'elite' concept, like in Clone empire or Millitant ethics. Those effects are severely blurred as the fire rate RTs are researched.
3. Fire rate RTs also distort late game combat by twisting the PD/strikecraft/missile balance. Remember that RTs can be accumulated indefinitly.
4. And that change is also very mod-incompatible, cause technically, there is no way to use ship 'size' in the game, and I have to mention all the ship size names - e.g. Cruiser (Vanilla), Strike Cruiser (NSC), Dreadnaught (RS) etc... - which is very frustrating as a modder.
For these reasons, I will not keep the fire rate RTs and/or add new defensive RTs.
Q2.
As you mentioned, hull is critical cause it directly involved in combat power such as fire rate. So I tried to take a more conservative approach to strengthening it. If 2% is really too weak as a single level RT effect, I'd fully agree to your opinion and change that number to 5% as you mentioned. I'd love to hear more from other users on this issue.
Q3.
No. As of now, I have no intention of doing that. That needs too much ideas and works. And I like 'vanilla-ish' Stellaris experience.
I wish this may be a good answer for your questions.
Thanks again for your concern and comment.
I would still suggest Hull getting a 5% tech, but considering the rest of your answers and the current balance so far, I wouldn't suggest any other changes in the meantime. Hope your mod gets some more recognition!