When the inside gets added, what doctor is it going to be based on, or is it going to be brand new of your idea? I have a suggestion but I must know that first

引用自 doctorblue5：

When the inside gets added, what doctor is it going to be based on, or is it going to be brand new of your idea? I have a suggestion but I must know that first

The interior is an entirely custom design

ok...... I wrote down the suggestion, just need to find it.

here it is, " a static model of a person, to be like a 'companion' "

so the tardis doors on the original and the updated tardis had a shadow error on the doors but besides that i like the original one better :)

Add a time rotor and console! (Your design) And, don't add all the buttons and levers pls, just the time nob, the reactor, etc would be neat to see! (Time nob beging a retro lever, reactor button being a white switch and the throttle being when the TARDIS time travels/flies.) Seeing that would be neat! Its cool rn now, but adding that would be cooler!

引用自 CEGIS {1-47} {1-47B} {1-470AP}：

Add a time rotor and console! (Your design) And, don't add all the buttons and levers pls, just the time nob, the reactor, etc would be neat to see! (Time nob beging a retro lever, reactor button being a white switch and the throttle being when the TARDIS time travels/flies.) Seeing that would be neat! Its cool rn now, but adding that would be cooler!

Not a tardis without the buttons, nobs, and levers.

引用自 doctorblue5：

引用自 CEGIS {1-47} {1-47B} {1-470AP}：

Add a time rotor and console! (Your design) And, don't add all the buttons and levers pls, just the time nob, the reactor, etc would be neat to see! (Time nob beging a retro lever, reactor button being a white switch and the throttle being when the TARDIS time travels/flies.) Seeing that would be neat! Its cool rn now, but adding that would be cooler!

Not a tardis without the buttons, nobs, and levers.

but if the "wheel," reactor switch, and cooler, could be on one panel of the console, that would be good, but the reactor itself should be in the rotor, it only makes sense.

引用自 doctorblue5：

引用自 doctorblue5：

Not a tardis without the buttons, nobs, and levers.

but if the "wheel," reactor switch, and cooler, could be on one panel of the console, that would be good, but the reactor itself should be in the rotor, it only makes sense.

I've thought of that! The time rotor in a console, I was thinking of that last night, it'd be very neat to see the time rotor pop up to reveal the reactor with what ever cell you put in it.

For those discussing placing the reactor and fuel cells in the time rotor, i love the idea. It reminds me of the film Lightyear, where the fuel cells are placed in a glass tube surrounded by a panel of controls.:D

as a question you guys like classic who or new who interiors better.
and as a second question do you guys like it when the time rotor better when its touching the ceiling(new) or not(classic)

if you answer the questions(and please do), please answer both.

引用自 doctorblue5：

as a question you guys like classic who or new who interiors better.
and as a second question do you guys like it when the time rotor better when its touching the ceiling(new) or not(classic)

if you answer the questions(and please do), please answer both.

I feel like both have their good and bad sides. The classic interiors are great because of the size limitations and how much functionality the sets had for their time, whereas now, the BBC have a much larger space to fit more tech and make a more interesting environment.

With the time rotors, it depends on the design and what the intended movement inside it is :)

this is great thx ;)

I have just made a horrifying discovery about the doctor

引用自 doctorblue5：

I have just made a horrifying discovery about the doctor

what is it?