安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Secondly, casual turns of phrase that aren't technically accurate are normal, and using them isn't the anti-intellectual gesture you're construing it as here.
Thirdly, the antivax propaganda line you mentioned is a bad example, since it refers to an ableist conspiracy theory and represents an attack on modern medicine-- the claim that vaccines cause autism is harmful both because it discourages people from protecting themselves from disease and because it implies that the risk of one's child dying is preferable to that child being autistic. Neither of these problems apply to "cold blooded," so no, it isn't the same. The difference is not only a matter of degree, but of something more substantial: the presence or absence of a harmful political motive.
Fourthly, I nonetheless appreciate the variety of facts you've shared here.