安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题








I'd like to see what Starfrost thinks of SAP and what Aubarino thinks of Zetas.
(Then the zeta murdered him and left the game)
An advantage SAP has is performance and the Personality options (can make them calm or paranoid etc).
However the disadvantage that SAP has is limited features and if you want 2 sides fighting each other its going to be much harder.
Advantages with Zeta is that there are a lot more options and its hard to get bored, you can even get Zeta moderators that are bots to jail wrongdoers including yourself and kick other bots that RDM etc, however the issue I have with this is if you once again want 2 sides fighting yes, it is possible but compared to SAP you are not going to have enough for a massive fight, I could vibe with 20-30 SAP bots and only like 8 Zeta which is sad.
Overall both are great but if SAP is going to walk into the steps of Zeta and remain optimised than it with all the features, the sky is the limit.