安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
10 
举报此帖
4) The Submarine Carriers are a wonderful addition. But, they should realistically only be carrying a handful of aircraft, not 20! Where would they be able to store such massive numbers of airplanes?
5) The upgraded Torpedo Tubes are way overpowered as we have built ships/subs with a 300 Torpedo Attack that literally slaughter a fleet single handedly! Subs in 1942 with 200 Torp Attack v the AI's 40 simply is unfair.
However it needs balancing. Does the AI use any of the new weapons, upgrades or new hulls? Does the AI upgrade old ships to use them?
1) The AI seems to only build and use the old MTG guns/hulls. When a player uses the new guns/modules/hulls and the AI does not, we outclass the AI severely. Outnumbered 4 to 1, our ships win and come home, the AI ships are sunk or heavily damaged.
2) Flight Deck Cruisers are a wonderful addition to the game (there should be Flight Deck Battleships too they existed)! But, our FDC equipped with the new modules, even without any aircraft, are wiping out AI battleships and heavy cruisers like they are nothing. A FDC without planes should be slightly weaker than a normal cruiser because it must sacrifice guns for hanger space and flight decks.