武装突袭3

武装突袭3

Ample Camo Pack Lite
Ron4Swat 2022 年 10 月 3 日 下午 1:49
Suggestions for a smaller lite pack
It seems to me that the lite pack contains alot of unecessary similiar stuff, that should probably be exclusive for the full version.

Especially the amount of different combat fatigues with more or less slight differences seem to be unecessary.

There are often around 10-12 different versions of a combat fatigure for a camo, which are labelled either with AAF, LDF or NATO.

I would argue that 3-4 different versions for a camo would be more appropriate for a lite version and would significantly reduce the size of the lite pack, considering that all the different verson of combat fatigues seem to be close to 50% of all uniforms.
< >
正在显示第 1 - 5 条,共 5 条留言
✠ DFSpecter 2022 年 10 月 4 日 下午 5:47 
I don't care what's removed as long as I have my M81 woodland.
I am a complete sucker for M81 Woodland. Don't know why. Just am.

Anyways, eh. I dunno. I'm no expert.
Seb  [开发者] 2022 年 10 月 6 日 下午 3:04 
I can only support every camo getting the same items. I could remove the CTRG or NATO fatigues for example, as I don't think they're as high quality as indep stuff but it'd remove them for every camo.

Keep in mind there is a lot of texture reuse too. The LDF, AAF, Light Fatigues, and Light Combat Fatigues use a total of two textures for all 4 items and their variants (double that for flag variants). It is not as simple as removing half the items and saving half the space.
Ron4Swat 2022 年 10 月 7 日 下午 12:59 
Interesting, i wasn't aware that different textures can be composed in this manner.

As you said, savings would be moderate, from what i have seen probably around 10 %.

There goes that idea.
Potts2023 2022 年 12 月 3 日 上午 10:55 
Ever thought of doing a Vietnamese K20 Camouflage?
ReboiVista 2023 年 1 月 4 日 上午 5:19 
The litest pack.
< >
正在显示第 1 - 5 条,共 5 条留言
每页显示数: 1530 50