安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
2 
举报此帖
Rebels would have perfect accuracy at close-range, and decent accuracy at long range, so just a bit worse than the soldiers.
Rebels would always play more defensively. They don't attempt to flank the enemy and generally try to stand their ground instead of advancing, unless if the situation calls for it (Combine defending a location, for example. I believe base HL2 already has this assault behavior you can custom-code in maps, so just play off of that)
Medics are more defensive than regular rebels because they're high-value. They tend to stick in cover and only point out to shoot when necessary. They crouch run around and keep their head down when attempting to heal someone.
Rebels are untrained, and as such they have a chance to panic when everyone starts dying. When a squad is down to its last 1-3 people, any remaining survivors have a chance to start fleeing depending on how many people are left in the fight (1 survivor left will almost always flee upon taking damage, 3 survivors will have a moderate chance of one person fleeing if there's 5 or more enemies, etc.)