安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
- When hands are empty, right-clicking on a pipe will remove the connection between the two hubs.
Does that sound reasonable?
Alternatively, you can make the cost of the hub include the cost of all connecting pipes. (This would require adding the ids of all connecting hubs to the Custom Data before completing the hub. If added after, have the system automatically reset the hub down to just a frame--with the components still in place--and add the cost of all declared connections.)
Truthfully, adding in either system sounds like a lot of hassle, but would reduce the economic cheese of the current system.
Does that sound reasonable?
Just came here to suggest a similar idea. Even something as simple as a text value in the customData where the pipeline will only make (or simply "prefer") connections with a matching text value whenever multiple options are present.