Hello, Great mod. There seems to a be a bug in the Canada Air tree where the aircraft 'Battle' doesnt show the icon.

Also, in the focus tree for the Australia they refer to the 'CAC Boomerang' however you have changed the aircraft in the tech tree as there is no Boomerang. It would be better to stick closer to vanilla in cases like this I feel.

My preference would be to reduce the thickness of black outline of the icons to match the ships and artillery.

引用自 sk065：

Hello, Great mod. There seems to a be a bug in the Canada Air tree where the aircraft 'Battle' doesnt show the icon.

Also, in the focus tree for the Australia they refer to the 'CAC Boomerang' however you have changed the aircraft in the tech tree as there is no Boomerang. It would be better to stick closer to vanilla in cases like this I feel.

My preference would be to reduce the thickness of black outline of the icons to match the ships and artillery.

I dont think that i want to remade 1700 icons to reduce outline to 1 pixel
I reworking all of Commonwealth nations armor tech trees today, might as well fix some air stuff in Australia and Canada.

About CAC Boomerang. I dont know which tech it should be. They produce only 250 of them from 1943 to 1945. In the other hand they have 848 plus Curtiss Kittyhawk's. So Curtiss Kittyhawk is the second most used fighter in RAAF after Spitfire.

引用自 Freezer：

引用自 sk065：

Hello, Great mod. There seems to a be a bug in the Canada Air tree where the aircraft 'Battle' doesnt show the icon.

Also, in the focus tree for the Australia they refer to the 'CAC Boomerang' however you have changed the aircraft in the tech tree as there is no Boomerang. It would be better to stick closer to vanilla in cases like this I feel.

My preference would be to reduce the thickness of black outline of the icons to match the ships and artillery.

I dont think that i want to remade 1700 icons to reduce outline to 1 pixel:stress:
I reworking all of Commonwealth nations armor tech trees today, might as well fix some air stuff in Australia and Canada.

About CAC Boomerang. I dont know which tech it should be. They produce only 250 of them from 1943 to 1945. In the other hand they have 848 plus Curtiss Kittyhawk's. So Curtiss Kittyhawk is the second most used fighter in RAAF after Spitfire.

It isnt such a big deal about the boomerang. Maybe I can find a way to edit the focus tree text as it looks like it is only 2 focuses that are affected by your changes. I understand about the black lines. Its too much work. Glad I could help with the bug on Canada.

引用自 sk065：

引用自 Freezer：

I dont think that i want to remade 1700 icons to reduce outline to 1 pixel
I reworking all of Commonwealth nations armor tech trees today, might as well fix some air stuff in Australia and Canada.

About CAC Boomerang. I dont know which tech it should be. They produce only 250 of them from 1943 to 1945. In the other hand they have 848 plus Curtiss Kittyhawk's. So Curtiss Kittyhawk is the second most used fighter in RAAF after Spitfire.

It isnt such a big deal about the boomerang. Maybe I can find a way to edit the focus tree text as it looks like it is only 2 focuses that are affected by your changes. I understand about the black lines. Its too much work. Glad I could help with the bug on Canada.

Also i dont understand why paradox give name to Australian focus that give bonus to stratigic bombers "CAC Woomera". CAC Woomera is not realy a strategic bomber, almost opposite. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAC_Woomera

I don't know if it just me, but for me every Infantry Equipment except for the inter-war infantry equipment have no icon

引用自 £uka$：

I don't know if it just me, but for me every Infantry Equipment except for the inter-war infantry equipment have no icon

It looks like you have conflicting mods. Some of your other mod use same files in interface folder.

I think the B-26 and the A-26 need to be moved to there correct spot in the tree. The B-26 was the medium bomber so-what replaced the ageing B-25s and the A-26 was the attacker that replaced the A-20s.

引用自 MrKleanupGuys2：

I think the B-26 and the A-26 need to be moved to there correct spot in the tree. The B-26 was the medium bomber so-what replaced the ageing B-25s and the A-26 was the attacker that replaced the A-20s.

I think it make sence, i will swap A-26 and B-26 in the next update, thank you.

happy to help you

Excuse me, but i have a problem with icons. Unexplored Soviet tanks and armored vehicles have default hoi4 icons from start and don't change even after research, can i fix this without buying addons (i have Waking of the Tiger only) or is it related to something else?
Thanks in advance)

引用自 DiMaster220v：

Excuse me, but i have a problem with icons. Unexplored Soviet tanks and armored vehicles have default hoi4 icons from start and don't change even after research, can i fix this without buying addons (i have Waking of the Tiger only) or is it related to something else?
Thanks in advance)

К сожалению, файл который заменяет иконки танков и все что связано с дизайнером танков- это часть ДЛС "No Step Back", так что без него иконки танков не будут отображаться.

В голландской ветке исследований последним тактическим бомбардировщиком стоит Short Stirling, что мне кажется несколько странным, с учетом того, что это был довольно тяжелый бомбардировщик, имевший 4 двигателя. Как мне кажется, на его место больше подходит B-25, находящийся в ветке морских бомбардировщиков.

引用自 HMS_Unicorn：

В голландской ветке исследований последним тактическим бомбардировщиком стоит Short Stirling, что мне кажется несколько странным, с учетом того, что это был довольно тяжелый бомбардировщик, имевший 4 двигателя. Как мне кажется, на его место больше подходит B-25, находящийся в ветке морских бомбардировщиков.

Are you talking about the Dutch or american with B-25 in naval bombers?

引用自 MrKleanupGuy：

引用自 HMS_Unicorn：

В голландской ветке исследований последним тактическим бомбардировщиком стоит Short Stirling, что мне кажется несколько странным, с учетом того, что это был довольно тяжелый бомбардировщик, имевший 4 двигателя. Как мне кажется, на его место больше подходит B-25, находящийся в ветке морских бомбардировщиков.

Are you talking about the Dutch or american with B-25 in naval bombers?

I was talking about Dutch tech tree

引用自 HMS_Unicorn：

В голландской ветке исследований последним тактическим бомбардировщиком стоит Short Stirling, что мне кажется несколько странным, с учетом того, что это был довольно тяжелый бомбардировщик, имевший 4 двигателя. Как мне кажется, на его место больше подходит B-25, находящийся в ветке морских бомбардировщиков.

Я этот мод делаю с 2019 года, за это время полностью сменились почти все иконки по 3 раза, а то и больше. Stirling там как плейсхолдер, Наверно хотел что то другое поставить и забыл или забил. B-25 у меня идет как бомбардировщик на 1940 слот, я стараюсь что-бы технологии не перемешивались у разных стран на разных слотах, те если у США условного B-25 стоит на 1940 году, то у всех остальных он будет там же.
На 1944 слоте в морских бомбардировщиках стоит PBJ-1, это именно специализированный торпедоносец и противолодочный самолет.
Ну энивэй, я себе пометку сделал, потом как соберусь с силами апдейт делать, поменяю и Short Stirling у голандцев.