安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题








That would make playing with monsters more strategic, pulling enemies in to traps and if failed suffer more. Monsters are really strong thought.
The more powerfull unit is the higher penalties should suffer from wrong terrain. Some monsters atm have no pennalties at all. Treants could suffer always out of forests some penalties if we look at huge buff in it.
Just my thoughts. I think You did great job.
Every cavalery units types e.g. Wargs should suffer in mountains..
Anyway, about your last point: I see what you mean, the thing is just that in my mind wargs, unlike horses, are pretty agile, so they wouldn't really have the same problems, especially since they have no riders.
Warg cavalry I definitely would penalize in mountains.
That's one of the biggest issues I have, I realize that everyone has different perceptions of fantasy creatures and I will not be able to satisfy everyone.
One solution would be to add smaller penalties in such cases, but this could easily lead to an overcrowded UI. Not too many people want to read through 10 terrain boni/mali to figure out how to properly use the unit. Still, as I mentioned in my other comment, I will keep it in mind in the future.