安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
0 
举报此帖
I don't disagree with you, though the degree should be considered. A common cold wouldn't render you completely unable to fight suddenly, though it certainly would make it harder.
Incapable...is mental, so I actually don't think it should hit insanely hard on prowess. There are plenty of people who are a bit hazy mentally who can be quite dangerous physically. Especially since most physical combat skill is tacit, meaning it is the last thing affected by mental degradation. Also it's already -12, that's a lot!
Infirm...oh yeah, that should really shut you down hard, I think you have a good point.
Mercenaries aren't something I've looked at deeply, so I think there's some things to be considered. I'm not sure I can do anything with mercenary alliances, I'm afraid, I didn't even know you could have them, honestly. But instead of buffing them, I'd be tempted to just reduce their prices a bit. As they are know they are incredibly expensive for their combat power. I'd rather make them cheaper, not stronger.
Welcome the realities of medieval warfare. You need to move your army along the river with them if you want them to have to cross it during the battle.
Ultimately, we are trained to think of rivers like barriers due to more modern war, in which actual front lines exist. In reality any opposed crossings in CK3's period were of fordable streams at most, and were only relevant at the scale of the battle itself. Think total war battle scale of conflict. Also, there is no way short of an entire engine rewrite that I could change this.
Honestly, larger rivers should just be barriers on the map with a few crossing points. But the engine doesn't really support this the way EU4 did with straits. And I'm not a map modder.
No longer should you be able to know everything that's going on from Scotland to Scandinavia if you're a Catholic ruler in Jerusalem.
I reckon this'll make the game a bit more challenging and will fix the borders a bit more.
Also, historically, there was a surprising range for diplomatic contact, though religion heavily affected that.
Give the liege the power to join in internal wars, no matter what. The King has the authority to back another vassal if he is fighting a rebellion. For example if I gave my brother some lands and his vassals rebel against him, I as the King should have the authority to join in,
Same for the other way around, if some counts revolt against a duke the king should have the authority to join on their side in order to dispose the duke.
TLDR Give the King more authority in internal wars.
Also moved to suggestions im not sure where to post it
Well, they kinda do have a reason. A large number of reasons listed out. But I think I know what you are getting at.
Basically, the maluses are heavy because the sources of positive opinion are far more plentiful, and the balance point in vanilla is around +30 average for people within your realm. If you try you can easily keep anyone, no matter how incompatible with you, at 100. That's just a little too easy.
This is a great example of why paradox has allowed opinions bonuses to such an extent with very few maluses. People don't feel good about maluses, and always question their validity far more than a bonus. But opinion inflation is a huge deal, and it has eroded difficulty in the game.
"Religious tenets have been rebalanced, with the goal of making more tenets viable or interesting. There should be, ultimately, no 'bad' tenets that are never worth taking in any situation. This will improve difficulty in the game, as the AI generally won't make their own religion, and thus the player will min-max and many default religions had weak tenets by default. Improving these 'bad' tenets helps this situation, and thus base religions will be stronger by comparison to their prior selves, or against the player min-max religion."
Well, what other mods do you have? Also, feel free to do a winmerge comparison with the normal tenet file, you will note quite a few changes.
Ah damn for some reason when I disabled the mod the changes were still in the game, so it seemed like the mod didn't do anything. But the files do show that there are buffs to certain stuff. At least I think that's what happened.
Honestly I would buff all those useless tenets even more. For example, sanctity of nature, I would give that some nature related buffs. Like better hunting, and/or buffing the current effects.
Alexandrian could probably have development bonuses too. That sort of thing. The syncretism ones, the pentarchy, etc are also really bad.
I think you were correct to buff some stuff. I think you could even double down on it if you feel you would never really pick certain tenets.