安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
As far as ice vs water density goes, that's not the issue in SE. The ice has weight, and cargos aren't buoyant to begin with.
What I'd *really* like to see is a 1x1x1 small grid 'door' to use to open/close such spaces. Doors are too big and often too heavy. There's one in AWG's conventient weapon pack, but that's ~950MB of tank parts for just one block.
I am on my phone, so can't check, but are the maintenance hatches airtight? (Or maybe those are from a mod - maintenance hatches that can open/close and are fairly low profile)
So if cargo containers aren't buoyant, then Ice is better for weight, yes? Because water is just neutral - it eliminates the positive buoyancy of the airtight space... Obviously balancing and control are issues as well.
I have a little sub I just finished with three separate sets of airtight spaces that combine for ~160% buoyancy, the lowest by itself gives only ~89% bouyancy. And the other two by themselves give ~101-103% bouyancy, one is above the center of gravity and other is almost exactly at the CoG. Ice collection lets me balance the sub with only ~800kg. So imo it's not one or the other it's how you use both.
Do you mean the access panels? I also prayed for them to be airtight when closed, but no such luck. They don't seal.
Otherwise, the only maintenance hatches I can find are indeed modded blocks.