安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题








Example:
Unsmelted Iron
Unsmelted Ebony
These would not be the same as ore so that might need to be addressed, meaning a separate list of how many "Unsmelted..." required to make the ingot. Seems pretty straight forward no matter which was you go with the descriptive word. I was just thinking Unsmelted would be a little more clear.
But wouldn't it feel odd to place an item in a smelter and recieve an 'unsmelted' ingot? honestly 'Unsmelted' is less fitting than 'Dirt'.
* For example 3 "Scrap" Iron or even just 3 (Iron) scaps give you an (Iron) ingot.
As for the designation of the recycled metals I go with "Scrap" too, for clarity. "Dirt" kinda covers it as well but indeed sounds less appealing, "Impure" seems like it implies less sturdy metal. And sorry, but "Unsmelted" doesn't make any sense at all IMHO.
I'll have some scrap then!