安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
0 
举报此帖
This is a link to how ridiculous it really gets.
It was not.
So many mental breaks.
This is rude. If it's an issue, then it's an issue for sure. Just saying "that's your issue" to try to deflect criticism is bad. My original post pointed out that Rimworld's based on western ideals, and that it's your issue that there's so many x and y in the z community(not naming anything but you could probably piece it together slowly,) but for an even fairer point, it's your issue that you haven't had the same experience as anyone else and never will unfortunately.
Even I lament the fact that I can't experience the same things as other people, it led to an inferiority complex. I've been working through it, but the question is, should your experiences override mine and invalidate all of my problems? I personally do not think so, as I don't think my experiences should override yours.
Were you going to post those examples? Ancient Greece and Rome, along with several Asian countries which had no cultural stigma against homosexual relationships tended to have many people in power being in relations with both men and women. Modern tests done by Alfred Kinsey even show that many people nowadays show SOME degree of bisexual behaviors even if they aren't aware of it Even if you don't want to do your research, you also should only need to change the options once so I'm not sure what issue you are having with that. Personally I don't see the issue with them being bisexual since that just means they aren't restricted on options.
By the ways, I don't give a single hoot over Alfred Kinsey, he has the same amount of respect to me as any other psychologist:They don't have a CLUE what they're talking about and they never have. There's a few times where they were right, but David Rosenhan+co, and Diederik Stapel proved that we as an entire species still can't begin to comprehend even a single inch of our brains, and those that say they can right now are frauds.
I'm not against bisexuality, mind you. My problem is when it begins to break the enjoyment of a mod by causing genuine problems. It's funny the first time around when someone goes catatonic over a failed romantic relationship, it's horrendous when your entire colony breaks down over really bad luck and having everyone trying to enter homosexual relations.
Seriously WTF I want to unsubscribe from this conversation, I've hit the button thrice now.
Anyways, the ancient Greeks generally frowned upon it too. The aristocrats of that era did it anyways, because it was exotic. The Romans only started to do it during their downfall, and like ancient Greece, it was generally disliked by the population, ignored by those with power as it was something new to sate their tastes.
This is probably my most controversial take, but its the one I believe in the most. If you attempt to challenge the status quo, you're socially executed. Unless you're really good, no company wants to take you on because they will be taken out with you. With ever increasing censorship, you're now only allowed to think in a very select spectrum of ways, or else you'll be persona non grata. If you kill a "saint", you end up with streets ablaze and active crime, all the while your useless politicians attempt to appease the mob. Hell, if you use the wrong words to describe someone, you'll get arrested! And putting biological males into female prisons is just wrong, especially if accused of sexual assault, just because you are not allowed to challenge what they think.