安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题








A good number of players don't use flint tools / weapons (because it has the same value as bone tools / weapons). In the same way, not a few are those who despise copper in favor of bronze.
Demanding 25 flint lances or 25 copper knives (as a milestone) would be a way to convince them to explore the entire technological tree. The same thing can be done with bronze swords.
________________
I'm playing the scenaro with a limit of 25 villagers. I like small villages and I find it fantastic. Thank you very much for the creation.
Kill x amount of each of the animals that become extinct, which they'd have to do before the extinction.
Surpluses of not so attainable or desired resources at the same time, eg. 100 fish, 100 fruit, 100 nuts, 100 bread which they'd def need to play differently to accomplish. No necessarily those numbers, but something possible without being naturally progressive.
Housing that would alter the usual way a player would upgrade, eg. 40 tents, 40 huts, 40 roundhouses as most players would be upgrading way before 40 normally.
Have 10 stables, 50 sheep and 50 cows at once, doable but a challenge as you'd also need a LOT of straw/grain.
Just some ideas.
I also skip most of the copper stuff :D
It's a nice idea but not so awesome.
The one with the fruits and nuts is also not so original :-(
The killing of Animals that extinct is already in the northlands or ancient warriors :-/