安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
https://psteamcommunity.yuanyoumao.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1882139456
https://psteamcommunity.yuanyoumao.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1990079757
The new situation system permanently hogging a bit of my Side UI is a bit obnoxious, although the origin is super cool.
1. made ranger lodge buildings avaliable on habitats for environmentalists with Voidborn ascension perk.
2. Give environmentalists planetary decision Expand nature preserve to create new "natural" distict blocker (Nature preserve extencion?) to gain more bonuses from ranger lodges on scarcely populated planets. And decision to remove some of preserves when planet become more populated (for cost of some unity and influence)
I suggest you add upkeep and drawbacks to make the players think about their choices. This isn't a bad reflection on your work, but an optimistic critique to make things more... interesting,
Many technology mods seem to follow the same design philosophy of increasing stats and making things easier, which quickly throws things off. I'd like to see one that forces a player to be considerate of all choices made, instead of "no-brainer" ones. ACoT & related mods are perhaps some of the worst examples of over-doing things.