安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题








I'm unsure how Trotsky or Bukharin are supposed to takeover. Trotsky needs to be "invited" and Bukharin needs to be chosen as the next "General-Secretary" or leader. When it came time to choose which path to take, Tukhachevsky as a dictator was the only option for the event so there's something I'm missing.
I'll find out more in a bit.
If you keep the NKVD and the Military as is (choose the +50 pp options for both) you get Tukhachevsky as dictator.
If you kill the NKVD and keep the Military intact, you get Bukharin.
If you keep the NKVD intact and kill the Military, you get Trotsky.
And if you kill the NKVD and kill the Military, you get Bukharin anyway.
Probably better to keep the Military with Bukharin instead of killing both for the sake of it.