安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题








2. It's something I have on my TODO list, I plan on reworking the whole flotilla system too to make everything more transparent and interesting.
3. Not yet, I'm waiting to have a "finished" version before touching AI improvements but in general I feel the game is more fair against AI because you can't cheese as much.
4. Former, only their "closest" friend gets access to the specific actions like in Vanilla.
5. They do stay around longer, it's harder to boost several factions at once because of decay now, and the cost can be pretty high to buy them all out (it scales with n° of systems owned), but the goal is still to have them disappear after mid-game.
6. That's already the case in vanilla.
One follow-up to the first point: did you adjust the industry cost and/or effects of improvements too? Basically, would I end up in a situation where I am running out of things to build, because anything will require strategic resources that I don't have? And so I might be left producing endless ships with no strategic or other resource requirements. Or will there generally always something to build, just maybe not what I'd ideally like? Adapting to what is available sounds like a nice requirement.