安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
0 
举报此帖
If he doesn't sell those regions to you, you will conquer them anyway. So now at least he gets some money in return instead of having to invest into a defensive force.
Reminds me somewhat of the Louisana Purchase...
That Frogophile just wanted to bolster his armies to fight against the Empire, if I do recall it properly...
Except they're the last faction that needs killing on the entire map and the settlement I can buy is their capital. :P
More constructively and not using extremes to demolish your argument, that's quite true; I have to pay them to nab settlements off them, and the AI does pay money just like the rest of us (just less). Taking it would certainly be worse for them; but then I only get a settlement lowered by one tier... and if it's inhospitable and you just want those settlements to stop the AI from having them, you should take a minor city and buy out their major city :P
Me, too.