安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
I have tested "megastructure_build_cost_mult" as well and it seems to also be invalid.
The modifier is not defined in the localisation, I will change that later :).
Just wanted to ask if this modifier (megastructures_cost_mult) is made by you?
I remember long time ago Master Builders gave discount on megastructures cost and I wanted to make something like this for myself, however I cannot find the proper name for the modifier Paradox used there.
Cheers!
Just want to get clarification on this part:
"If you have this tradition and your opponent in a war looses against you, then he receives those additional modifier like reduced growing etc."
So tonight in a multiplayer game my federation submitted a status-quo and found ourselves on the receiving end of these modifiers. I was wondering if you do status-quo, its technically not a lost battle. Is there an algorithm you can use to determine this?
As an example:
Three of us waged war against a 5-6 man AI group and right now we have taken out enough territory and could submit a status quo. But because we have not claimed all territory from all enemies in said group, we received the negative effects.
Just trying to figure out if this is working as intended -- or just not aware that it is working in this way
Thanks!!
I just won a war, imposed mine terms and I GOT THE DEBUF from mine Tradition... hahahaha
The next update will follow in about 2 hours. Then they will be gone.