安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
I.e You're a soldier of Nation XYZ and decide to practise convoy driving in Arma 3. That is not allowed. That would be in violation of the EULA of Arma 3, and, if you use this particular vehicle to do the training, then of the EULA of this addon too.
Additionally: If you used the addon and put it to use in VBS (That is the explicitly military version of Arma sold to all NATO countries and some others) this would be in violation.
And before you laugh at this: My dayjob is actually developing VBS, and there are a handful of requests per year where customers ask to take community made assets from Arma as part of their training scenarios.
(The best path here would be to sort out a deal with the content creators about licensing the assets for military use in VBS. However, you would need to cut in BISim and probably BI to, as you used one of their tools to create the assets in game-ready state. If you don't: Violation of EULA and, since in these cases actually monetary damages can occur, it could be prosecuted.)
However as soon as a mod is uploaded you full under those laws, you can't curtail your own usage restrictions.
That being said, it's almost all moot as the bulk of them are covered by ARMA EULA anyway.
Cause Bohemia can give permission for millitary institutions to use thier product if they want to. And if that was the case, you're EULA is overruled.
Not trying to stir the pot. It's just reality.
Mods can and do have EULAs. BI explicitly encourages this.
https://www.bohemia.net/community/licenses/
Let me provide some background, as I'm familiar with both VBS and Arma 3 as an end user.
I served 14 years in the United States Marine Corps, we occasionally got to perform some simulated training in VBS, not often, but we did.
As our platoon Gunnery Sergent, if we wanted something added into VBS, community content in this case, I would have to file some paperwork requesting that the mod be looked into, and send it up to the Company CO, he would then either reject it, or pass it on to whoever was in charge of hadling these things, they would likely then have to put in a request to BISim and BI, who would also have to contact the Mod author(s), if all were okay with it, it would get ported over to VBS, if not, tough ♥♥♥♥.
Even if they don't allow MIL/LE/GA usage of their mod, frankly we would have been fine without this one particular vehicle. Between Vanilla VBS, RHS, and ACE3/ACRE, we were squared away.
Lastly, why would you be mad if the people you hate can't use this one particular mod for training purposes?
If you just read the thread, the dev has explained what he's saying and why he's saying it in great depth already.
The dev is talking about use of this mod in VBS (the military version of Arma). Not the use of Arma itself. But this mod in specific.