安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Libertarian capitalists make me think of Tatoïne in Star wars. Everyone is free to have is properties (beings or things), and the only rule is money. I like it.
Mutualist cooperative is kinda the same, but with stronger moral and human rights (I must say xenos rights). A kind of utopia.
For the two others, in my opinion they must be more different than what you wrote. I agree with you that anarchist must be mainly focused on citizen rights whereas communist. But for me communist must be more focused on development and on prosperity (and militarist in the case of revolutionner)
I know it’s an easy shortcut to say that : but communist is the devotion of workers for motherland. (I may have played to much red alert ^^’ ) than anarchist don’t care about development and prosperity as long their people are free.
What your thinking of about communism is industrialist collectivist authoritarians, sort of like stalinist soviet union. the Communist revolutionary AI personalities are ment to be trotskyist or marxist internationalists, not soviet-style patriots.