安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
My personalities are randomized just like vanilla's, and have certain requirements based on ethos, civics, traits, etc. For instance, Plunderers of Knowledge requires Militaristic, Splendid Isolationists requires Xenophobic, etc. They also have various weights based on ethos, civics, traits, etc just like vanilla's personalities. If you see random personalities that makes no sense, like Splendid Isolationists who're Xenophile, that may be a mod conflict or corrupted installation.
AI personalities like: Haughty Supremacists, Proud Nationalists, Plunderers of Knowledge - Have by default set any other species as undesirable. Even if the empire is neither xenophobic nor authoritarian.
AI personaliteis do affect the preferred settings an empire uses, and the settings they start with. (This includes the player.)
Lastly, I'm a bit confused on why many AIs are randomized, instead of being linked to specific factors like civics and traits. Every time start a new galaxy with the same empire for testing over I get a different AI despite having nothing change about its core properties. If requirements aren't met shouldn't pick a vanilla one? I haven't noticed a single Hegenomic Imperialist during my testing.