安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Those are the two that immediately come to mind, but I suppose I'd have to follow up on your suggestion to see whether they would even pan out. They very well might not, after all.
Something tells me it would have to be made specifically to derive its transmitted bonus directly from the bonuses transmitted to it, and that it would only work with modules that provide a similar bonus. A speed module would receive productivity from one side, and send productivity through the other, but would not be able to receive speed and/or yield and then send those bonuses, whereas a multi-boost module would be able to do that with any combination.
Granted, at some point, it becomes busted, but I for one would like to make a progressively more expensive superfactory. The factory must grow and all that.
i published and its now got the new model and block configs.