安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









The format we’re working with here is a high-level language, so it’s not straightforward to add live predictions like in the in-game lb preview. In a low-level language such as IC10 MIPS, each operation expects only one very specific type of parameter, which makes it easier to anticipate the next token. In a Basic-style language, however, there’s no reliable way to predict whether the user intends to type "=", "+", "-", "C", "%", or something else, unless we integrate a machine learning component — which would add too much complexity for this context.
I’m open to any suggestions you might have for a simpler approach.
There were no major changes in the IC10 language, so yes, you can use it.
You asked how precise it is, I’m not sure how to answer that. Since it’s a compiler, the precision depends on your code. You’ll need to understand the device variables and how to use them to control the devices you need.
There are plenty of examples on GitHub to help you get started, and you can also join our Discord for support.
Cheers!
We have 512 line and not 128
The first result on google for "ChatGPT" is the tool, under OpenAI's site. OpenAI is just the business that develops it, perhaps you thought it was something different?
Anyways, here is the link : https://openai.com/