安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
You're right, thanks for clarifying - this change seemed to have slipped my mind :D
@ktoffel glad you like it. Some time ago CA removed merlons as physical blockers, which I think is a good thing since range units now are actually willing to shoot units that are on top of walls. In turn they added an effect to all units that are docked on walls that gives +20% Range, +25% Missile Block Chance (Shield) and +10% Missile Resistance, so that the theoretical benefits of merlons are still impacting the battle. Giving units another missile resistance or block chance seems overtuned to me, since 25% Block and 10% Resistance already is a lot.
Wanted to ask for a little feature, none the less:
What do you think about adding a missile block modifier for units on the walls, representing merlons of the parapet.
Or probably a flat out missile resist?
cheers