安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






在 Twitter 上 



You could try "Dangerous Ice" mod so Ice deals damage to units. But I'm not sure does it work properly - it's not mine. But I remember it being pretty good
BTW ingame "russia" ALREADY has uniques stolen from Ukraine: both Cossacks AND Lavras are Ukrainian heritage. Firaxis done goofed, it's like giving USA Scottish Highlanders. The only reason anyone should have unique units for russia in their game is so you can see little green men get irradiated when you nuke moscow.
How come people playing historical games not understand what colonization is? Also, insisting Peter having unique nuclear icebreakers is like asking for Sumer to have SCUD missiles because Saddam Hussein did.
What I know to be a problem though is that the icebreaker doesn't ignore the movement cost of passing through ice. This could be an incompatibility. I'll run a test to root out the problem.
While I understand your reason for not putting them in, and you as a mod dev can do anything, omiting a hundreds of years of civilian maritime history, (and it being the only country with nuclear ice breakers) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear-powered_icebreaker seems like a tad bit of an oversight. (and considering near all of the countrie's ice breakers were made in soviet times, and the in game russia is represented by peter, from the 1700's, adding russian ice breakers has very little correlation to anything 1990- onwards