安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
奖励
campaign_cultural_relations_tables
should be deleted/
Also, it would be interesting to see the changes Drakken said, or something of similar vein.
Thanks a ton for a great mod Wiid!!
Just to give you a comparison... As the mod is now it is cheaper to support an army encamped deep in foreign territory than to support an army marching normally right outside of your capital in the heart of your empire. I think the mod will be even better with these balance changes.
Thanks again Wiid for your great mod!
I think that having your troops encamped in foreign territory should have a different effect as encamped in your own territory. For example currently encamping in your territory and you get a 10% reduction in upkeep and recruitment. However, if you encamp in foreign territory you actually get a 20% reduction in upkeep (by cancelling the 10% penalty and adding another 10% reduction) and also still get the 10% reduction in recruitment.
I would think that encampment in foreign territory should only cancel the 10% increased upkeep for being in foreign territory. Perhaps keeping the 10% reduced cost of recruitment in foreign territory makes sense when encamped since you are forced to use global recruitment at that time.
Love the mod. I would like to offer some ideas if you don't mind. I think there is too much uniformity in the values for the different stances.
I would argue that putting an army into march mode should increase its upkeep by 5% in your territory and to +15% in foreign territory. Troops moving faster means less chance to forage and increased effort means troops will eat more, machinery/equipment might need more repair, and so on.
I would argue that sitting in ambush/stalking stance also should have increased upkeep +15% in foreign territory for the same reason. An army in ambush stance is trying to stay hidden so there is less chance to forage for supplies locally hence more upkeep/supply is needed. Perhaps even increasing to +5% in your own territory as well.
Having your armies in these stances should be different than when they are in no stance. It adds to the strategic depth in a logical way.