安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题




Unlike in today's boats, there is no way to solve the 3 DIMENSIONAL problem submarine on submarine combat poses with WWII tech. We have sonic and radar guided torpedoes that can dynamically change depth and "fly by wire" systems that allow the sub to control the torpedo directly. None of that is possible with WWII technology, but is certainly possible today.
Sure, I guess you could make a torpedo dive to 100 meters, but nobody ever thought it was a good idea to do that because you'd have to be so unbelievably lucky to actually hit an enemy sub that there really isn't a point in even trying. Again, how do you propose to do any sort of target acquisition data for this? In WWII this simply isn't possible.
If you want a game that does have modern sub on sub combat, look up Cold Waters. It is not, however, WWII.
Actually Allied submarines accounted for quite a few Axis submarines during the war. All except for one was on the surface but the only submerged submarine on submarine kill in history happened at the close of WW2, again by a Royal Navy submarine vs a U-boat.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinking_of_U-864#:~:text=The%20German%20U-boat%20U-864%20was%20attacked%20and,submarine%20sank%20another%20while%20both%20were%20submerged.