安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题




Some suggested definitions are increasing property prices, increasing education level, or increasing income.
Still, neither of these parameters necessarily means that a higher social class replaces a social one.
Some examples:
* Industrial neighborhoods are renovated to include housing. No population replacement.
* Rising property prices without significant population replacement.
* Generation shift; working-age adults replace retired people. No shift of social classes, since a younger generation has on average spent more years at school than their parents have, and working people earn more than retired people.
Examples of one social class replacing another, are rare and isolated.
In the 21st century, rich people tend to move to city centers. Many move into new-built infills, or redeveloped industrial districts. In a few neighborhoods, they replace poor people and ethnic minorities.
The few neighborhoods where inhabitants are forced out through rising rents, tend to have a central location of historical importance. That might explain why gentrification is such a hot topic, though it affects a very small part of the population.
This migration pattern has been weaker in Europe, where city centers have been the dwelling place of the rich since before modern times, and poor people and immigrants tend to live in high-rise suburbs.
"Clones & Drones" has the Housing Market Bubble, which should probably be linked to more different situations.
"Industrial Evolution" adds the Rust Belt. There could be use for some other situations related to urban planning.