安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
1 
举报此帖
If you view some of the single player campaign you can see the assets that they used are, what you may describe as generic.
It's not a fallacy to think that they didn't pay attention to these btw - simply that if you think from a historical p.o.v. there were generally 2 types of structures. These were older bricks and mortar and newer concrete structures.
In addition to which, most of the fighting on the eastern front was (apart from the major combat zones, like Leningrad and Stalingrad) in the country.
While it appears to be quite western front centric, a lot of these buildings and shops were quite similar, simply laid out with more space between them.
Check out old wartime and pre wartime footage regarding Russian cities and you can see the similarity between them. While form may change slightly, function is pretty similar.