安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题




If you try manually opening and closing your park to simulate real operation, you will likely encounter money issues. The amount of time to build up your attendance to a profitable level again would be reversed when you have to close the park again. Operating costs will continue while the park is closed, but the income coming in will be so disrupted that it will be counter intuitive.
I think the primary challenges that prevent this idea from working is that the game time isn't real time. Imagine it taking 3 actual years to complete a true campaign scenario! Money is also different. We might be able to get our peeps to pay $5 for a hot dog, but construction costs are vastly cheaper than in real life. A coaster in the real world could take millions to build while in Parkitect, an expensive coaster costing $35,000 would be a steal!