安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
(I think the division into classic and full works for you as is)
also the giant earthworms are surface dwellers in the game so why would I have to simulate digging?
To be honest I am also not a big fan of the surface worm either, I didn't know what it was for the longest. I thought it was a strange snake thing. Personally I would make it larger. My initial reaction to the worm was "yuk" I don't want to hunt those worms, why would I even tame them?
But then I started hunting them for their leather...
If the "squid" in the documentary you mentioned is as large as an elephant and lives on land, then it must have a skeleton or something similar to support it. And that makes it far removed, evolutionarily, from modern squid by millions of years. It sounds more fantastic than many creatures from D&D.
i do agree that the larger animals should have higher stats though and be slower.
I would also like to see giant animals as pack animals even if they aren't rendered with a pack on them.
Rabbuck have a size of 0.9, same as deer? To be fair, Russians have intensively bred a rabbit to be the size of a medium-large dog. But still...
However, I do not think the Giant Earthworm fits RimWorld very well. (Also, who wants to eat it or the eggs? Yuck!) And the Megasquid? It's a cool animal, to be sure. But it really breaks my suspension of disbelief to see it 'lumbering through the forest', esp. at human speed. It should be a strictly aquatic animal. It would be crushed under its own weight.