Garry's Mod

Garry's Mod

GDCW G3A3
21 条留言
letus 2020 年 4 月 4 日 下午 1:07 
in spain this weapon call CETME
VONGRATS 2017 年 3 月 21 日 下午 1:26 
can you make a shotgun?
SturmWerwolf 2016 年 12 月 27 日 上午 2:47 
I'm in the same boat. GDCW is the best base by far. I can't stand TFA, CW, MK9 etc. they feel so unnatural and lazy.
Tyr4de 2015 年 12 月 16 日 上午 8:14 
TFA is basically M9K with some added ♥♥♥♥ piled on top.
Space's Belly Button Fluff 2015 年 10 月 27 日 下午 8:45 
Dude, don't worry about these kids, GDCW is by far my favorite base for making weapons and using weapons on, so just stay with it
Riastradh 2015 年 10 月 27 日 下午 3:11 
personally a not a fan of wood on a G3 but as a gun its AMAZING
Lab Rat  [作者] 2015 年 10 月 27 日 下午 1:41 
It's retarded really, the recoil is just fine in GDC i barely need to customize anything, that specific AWP isn't already in CW. it's a different animation. other than that, you really arent forced to use this i dont see why you complain lol, and the ♥♥♥♥ iron sights arent the bases fault, just because CW has a feature to fix this doesnt mean its GDC's fault i really dont see the hate for GDC other than it having less features, its a solid base. no one is forcing you to use this. i don't see the need to complain don't like it don't use it, if it botheres you so much go make this on CW2.0, i can't be arsed to waste my time on changing a base for only 2 features that i like there. (weapon movement and the iron sight "fix")
Lab Rat  [作者] 2015 年 10 月 27 日 下午 1:41 
Outdated, sure. I fail to see how it performs horribly, really. works just fine for me. besides, the way the recoil works in other bases is so retarded i can't take it, i suppose i can tweak it but lets take CW2.0 the way you make a swep there is nice and all that you have tons of things you can change and customize, but tons of it is just time consuming and not efficient, lets take the weapon sounds for example. why the hell do i need to time the sounds correctly to match the reload animation when it works automatically perfect on GDC, just an example.
xXxCallOfDutyFan2009xXx 2015 年 10 月 27 日 下午 1:29 
I ran out of space to put this down.

J. TFA and CW2 use coding that diminishes visual recoil while aiming down sights. Making them less spastic.
xXxCallOfDutyFan2009xXx 2015 年 10 月 27 日 下午 1:28 
A. I never said anything about a competition, stop being such a drama queen.

B. I'll tell you why GDC is ♥♥♥♥, it's outdated and performs horribly compared to the other bases out there, hell, I've even seen weapon_base outperform GDC

C. Even if you blame the animation recent bases like CW and TFA take care of that. TFA allows for more client control, you don't have to be forced to play the same way that others do. TFA allows you to customize your crosshair to your own liking. I don't see that in GDC

D. Trust me, there are some good CW weapons out there. For example, MultiBers' weapons

E. I'm going to tell you, you're one of the few people who even make weapons for this base.

F. Do we need another G3, AWP, USP on a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ base then one already pre-packaged *cough*that AWP is already in CW2*cough*

G. I started writing this at 3:11 PM

H. I have researched, I've had the base too, it ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ sucks.

I. The ♥♥♥♥ iron sights are the base's fault.
Lab Rat  [作者] 2015 年 10 月 27 日 上午 6:14 
also one last thng @Mr. Gasmask there is one more thing you haven't realized. and dont get me wrong I don't mind criticism. Just please at least research a little before you "realize" things. this is a different model than the one CW2.0 has. And this isn't a competition. I don't care who makes better sweps or which base is better, I do this for my own enjoyment if you have a problem with what I do on my free time, thats a little sad. don't use it if you don't like it, it's simple as it is. thanks. :)
Lab Rat  [作者] 2015 年 10 月 27 日 上午 5:26 
enough people told me that TFA is better and GDC is ♥♥♥♥ without telling me why, ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ lol
Lab Rat  [作者] 2015 年 10 月 27 日 上午 5:25 
and 90% of the C.W. weapons ive tested are complete crap, so go lecture me i still dont see why does it matter if this base is outdated if sweps here look way better, OK except the iron sights which arent even the base's fault. its the animation, this gun is made for CSS where there is obviously no iron sights?
Lab Rat  [作者] 2015 年 10 月 27 日 上午 5:24 
decent recoil my ass, ive tested TFA sweps they are crap
xXxCallOfDutyFan2009xXx 2015 年 10 月 27 日 上午 4:36 
Stuff I realized.

1. There's already a better one on the C.W. 2.0. Base by MultiBers(can't recall his exact username)

2. The iron sights are ♥♥♥♥

3. This base is outdated. You should switch to TFA base. It actually has decent recoil.
Lab Rat  [作者] 2015 年 10 月 27 日 上午 12:05 
If I'll find one that is good enough, I will.
Space's Belly Button Fluff 2015 年 10 月 26 日 下午 8:59 
Also ♥♥♥♥ cw 2.0 too many people use it, stick to gdcw!
Space's Belly Button Fluff 2015 年 10 月 26 日 下午 8:59 
please make another GDCW sniper rifle! first one has great anims looking forward to the next one.
✯BerzerKing✯ 2015 年 10 月 26 日 上午 6:20 
owww :(
Lab Rat  [作者] 2015 年 10 月 25 日 下午 11:35 
I don't like any other base other than GDC. sorry.
✯BerzerKing✯ 2015 年 10 月 25 日 下午 2:54 
Wouldnt mind some CW 2.0 weps from you. your other gun mods are pretty good quality :)