安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






If you're interested EctoSage, I'd be willing to upload them to the workshop (while providing credit, of course).
planets has arrived. Yay !!!!
yeah i did that, but i was also on the planet map which has gravity, and neither thing worked
agreed but you may ned just some small reactors around the rover so if the big one's go boom you still have some
Then your fighters must be bulky as hell, not to mention expensive to build. I'm going to guess most of the people boasting about how many large reactors they use are using sandbox mode to 'easy' design. I mean, why bother making your design effective when you can just add another 8 large reactors and build a wall of large thrusters, right? :P
2 large reactors?
Overkill?
Well, i had about 5 large reactors in my superfast fighter so, pretty formidable, those reactors might power any other attatchment, it may function as a mobile base, or a spacecraft carrier for land.
Overkill?
not uploading to workshop without sage's permission since they are based on his work.