安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
However, doing this obviously necessitates introduction of a shortcut for traffic heading to the 1st exit. (otherwise you have vehicles rapidly cutting their way through every lane of the roundabout)
Once you have such a shortcut, the roundabout's function is moot, as its only carrying traffic for the 3rd exit (and 4th exit u-turn).
To cut a long story short, the logical conclusion of making the aforementioned optimisations was this:
http://psteamcommunity.yuanyoumao.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=410400791
I've yet to test how much load it can carry (some of the slip lanes are a little sharp), but at a theoretical level it seems like the optimal solution for merging 2 equally balanced highways.
Now as there are 22000 citizens, there is so much traffic, that its getting congested because of cars trying to switch lanes. Time for another entrance into the district I guess.
Theory being:
- it'd minimize weaving (traffic joining the roundabout having to filter into traffic that's about to leave the roundabout)
- it'd encourage the lane pathing to make fuller use of all 3 lanes of the roundabout.