@I Am Full Truie Oh I know!! I hate seeing that exact message on my own mods lol Also I see you updated. Thanks!

@Ranger np man, when it's civilly expressed and not "WHERE UPDATE" i'm always happy to reply

@I Am Full Truie Yeah I was seeing as much. Thank you for answering my surely annoying questions and for the mod.

@Ranger i'll check but i see no reason as to why it would not work, it does not overwrite anything from the base files, rather it just adds its own things on the side

@I Am Full Truie So it is working just fine? I was looking at the code and figured as much but wanted to be sure.

@ENFP thanks for the info mate, i'll update to latest version just to get rid of the warning sign

@Ranger trust me, the latest patch did not break this. You can just keep using it.

@I Am Full Truie I love this mod and it has made its way permanently into my playlist. Is there a planned update?

@ck3user7748 hi ! if any of the mods is in gambo's supercompatch, put it before, else put it at the end preferably yes ! :)

love the concepts you have broken down into bite-sized mods. Are these save game compatible? I'm guessing yes? If I'm using a modlist such as Gambo super compatch, I'm guessing I should put these at the end - is that correct, or does the order not even matter due to how you've implemented the mechanics?

@fisto the robo game rule available for counties, in any case ;)

@ENFP it's up ;)

Looking forward to the AI game rule!

good

Awesome mod.

@fisto the robo yes i'll implement a game rule for that
i'm working on other mods atm though

@I Am Full Truie: would it be possible to apply this to distant counties, depreciating control or popular opinion?

@Captain SSmolleTT not yet, a game option will be added

Does that apply to AIs?

@RL - Alioshax interesting indeed ! i'll consider it, performance might take quite the hit though at it would require making distance calculations for every single county (especially when i'll have added the apply to AI game rule, but this is up to people to activate it or not)
thanks for the suggestion mate :)

Good mod. If i can suggest a small addition to prevent cheesing, a similar negative modifier could be added to control progress. It should be hard for a ruler to reach 100 control on a county located thousands of kilometers away from his capital. This way, there is no "escaping" the negative opinion by just ruling personnally holdings far away.

Brilliant idea

an idea: for desure titles with the same culture maybe it should be a lower penalty. just because the capital is on the other side of the country if its part of the same country and culture I can't see why people would be mad

actually i'll just put it into this one

@Archon, archoff i'll actually #1 check this isnt in the game, but so undertuned (PDX...) that it is has no impact and #2 make it a mod. It just makes sense. thanks for the idea mate !

Really interesting premise ? Would it be possible to do something similar with acceptance reasons for alliance+marriages. Really not a fan of how ck3 lets say, A count in england ally with a duke in the polish interior, and thats actually more beneficial than marrying a neighbouring count...

Wow i didnt even read that sorry

@emerald10005 I said I'd do it already ;)

At least make it optional for the people like me who want to nerf AI empires

Please make a game rule where this applies to AI

I like this mod's premise! Not TOO hard, but very slightly raises the difficulty a bit...

+1 for that apply to AI game rule. Something needs to keep the Blobzantine Empire in check

Thank you!

@Koivuka I can add a Game Rule in the future yes ;)

Any chance you could make this apply to AI also?