安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






Although, looking at the screenshots provided, I think I know what you mean about the piston assemblies in the reactor building. Those can stay put - they look appropriate.
The ones near the generator room can also stay put. They look really nice and appropriate as well.
However, what I'm looking at is a way to make the pistons inside the reactor building, retractable. So they can be extended and connected, or retracted and disconnected for reactor maintenance.
I'll still do a walkthrough, and let you know what I think of the design. Still though, I would like it modified so that it is all above-ground, and so that it is project-able and usable in survival mode without all the prep.
Also, given what you've said, it seems like you're looking for an entirely different design. I'm not trying to be difficult, but I don't want this to turn into a get-a-rock drill.
If one of the subgrids is control rods, then you can keep those. On the other hand, you can eliminate the giant fan entirely. I don't intend to ever go in the cooling tower space.
Also, remember what I said about hydrogen or oxygen tanks? Those were meant to be representative of coolant piping.
You don't have to make it look like 1:1 replica of a real plant. It can be a case of "close enough."
As long as it looks the part, and all the critical "safety" subgrids (think: control rods and coolant piping) check out, we're golden.
I'll kick out an entirely new version (not overwrite the current one) that includes something like "Projector Buildable" in the name (or PB; the name's already too long). I'll let you know when I publish it.
(I only work peripherally in the nukie world; I deal with the ass-end of the fuel cycle...handling and transportation of radioactive waste.)
If you can rip off the spent fuel pool or alternatively, place it somewhere on the surface, that would be fine, oh and please rearrange the piping to be on the surface, Or at least rearrange the internal piping.
I did not know you worked in the industry, I therefore bow to the one who has more expertise than me.
I did not know you worked in the industry, I therefore bow to the one who has more expertise than me.
Ultimately, I think you know more about what you want than I do, so have at it. Change whatever you want to meet your needs and have fun with it. Let me know how it turns out.
However, for your second comment, these hydrogen tanks (can also be oxygen tanks) are meant to be used as a representative for the reactor cooling system, which would be filled (charged) with cryogenic gas (liquid oxygen and/or liquid hydrogen.)
When the tanks are connected to the reactor and the tanks are filled with oxygen or hydrogen, the reactor functions properly.
If the tanks are not connected or not charged, an alarm sounds. A few minutes later, assuming the charge state and/or the connection state remains the same, the reactors melt down. (Aka, they blow up.)
Preferably one that doesn't require as much prep as this one.
I intend to use it as a rusty hulk that needs an extensive rebuild in order to work. Complete with a "meltdown script" that will cause the plant to explode if switched on before a majority of the cooling units (hydrogen tanks hooked up to the reactor) are in place, connected and online.