安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
@Laguette: Whatever for?
One minor issue I encountered was in the World Congress when choosing a civilization to target for some kind of effect. Instead of the normal Tibet icon, it showed a question mark (like before any civ is selected) in the Tibet colours. Any ideas what that culd be caused by?
Ironically, although the writing slot does work on Machu Pichu you can't move a writer there. But you can just swap a writing that you made somewhere else to Machu Pichu.
If so I do have a neat suggestion; Mackenzie King, and yes I know other modders have done him but I feel you could do the civ excellently!
he lead Canada through industrialization, the great depression, and then WW2.
Instead of the four faces of peace; "In Flanders Fields" which provides 1 more diplomacy points from allies as well as no warmonger penalties for joining allied wars, less warmonger penalties for joining a friends war, 20% production towards units while at war and an additional 20% when liberating cities. They can have surprise wars declared on them but cannot declare on city states.
If you like the idea I hope to one day play it! If not I still appreciate you taking the time to read this and for all the great mods you've made!
It would be like Canada being upset that the Cree are in the game, that is the level of stupidity this is at right now. It is a game and this happened in the past, even if you are so supportive of China that you could never fathom Tibet leaving their clutches, what is the big deal about a video game having a Civilization based on the Tibetans? Just baffling to me!
"But the yuan dynasty" like the yuan were mongols in the mongol empire does that make Hungary or Romania a part of China no no it does not England was a part of France for a while does that mean France has a natural right to conquer england an annexation is an annexation people need to learn the difference between a state and a nation