安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题






i haven't really played Norsca tho, just opened em up and looked at em turn 1, so if the consensus
(obviously not majority) from my vast 149 subs is that it should be cheaper then i guess i could change it.
it does also seem like with Norsca being a better CA faction than usual that they may have realized their stance costs are flippin stupid and made Norsca's stance costs reasonable. As usual tho when they make some balance change like that with a new faction or legendary lord they don't bother to back update every other faction.
Movement never really bothered me until I started a Throgg campaign.
Here.
I'll give this a go, and hopefully there's no conflicts *I'm looking at you mod manager"
i don't own the TK expansion yet so i assume the ambush stance in settlements is something to allow them to hide while in their own cities? so i reduced the AP cost of that from 50 down to 30.
pretty sure the pack was still working cuz no changes occurred in the DB phrasing. but idk - haven't been playing.
p.s.
i really hate CA's mod manager.
I think it needs an update, though.