安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









Why use three 0.5*0.1 blocks/slopes instead of a single 1*0.2 slope ?
You could merge the 1*0.2, the 1*0.4, and the blocks below into a single 1*0.9 block
And use a single 1* 0.3 slope for the bottom
And so on...
Also, if I counted properly, this circle has 44 sides (on the outside only). I know the point is to make a circle that looks like circle instead of a box, but I think this is too much. I'd go for 16 sides (still talking only about the outside) total to make it easier to build and reduce the performance impact. Plus, using less but bigger blocks means each block has more health, making it harder to pierce through the armor.