安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题










I am always open to receive constructive feed back, especially when they are constructive as yours.
I agree with you, the LOD model must be worked again so that it have less "break" there.
thank you again
but: you have been very hard on the lod in my opinion. a little more details would be appreciated. i think you could make a really fluent transition between model and lod with about 100 tris. those "thinner" parts of the building should be seen in lod, too.
and i really think that it is a pity that the lod-model doesn't show any enlightened windows. that fact really jumps into ones eye when zoomin out/in.
i hope you enjoy constructional criticism/feedback and keep up the good work.