安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
奖励
Not at all dude, and by the way you really not use a good game for comparison, Quake 1 was just a very average port, and Quake 1 was an "early" N64 game, like many games of that first year of the N64 it really not used the full power of the N64 (even a good port would have not, that game was very blocky in comparison to later games) with some notable exeptions like Goldeneye, Waverace (for it 3d water effect)
Quake 2 was more like it, and for the most part, when the N64 games had drawbacks in comparison, it was usually always because the space limitation of the cartriges, really not of it power.
Are you on crack? If the N64 better than any PC in 96-97, please explain why Quake (1996 pc game) was so downgraded when ported to the N64 (lower resolution, far worse textures, reduced geometry detail, etc.)? Oh that's right, because the N64 was under-powered in comparison.