安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









Easy.
I know that this game is not simulation, but just arcade skirmish experience, but would like for common sense to apply. Swords beating spears in formation style fight is a joke, but in "mash-pit" is quite realistic. Cavalry losing to swords is quite far from truth, sure you can charge from the back and win the engagement, but if your unit get stacked in the fight with them you can already drop them as dead unit.
Also, I'm interested in units relations. Please correct me where I'm wrong:
Swords beat any other infantry type (i.e. spears) regardless of their and enemy's class (i.e. heavy). Also, I've saw swords beat cavalry.
Spears and pikes beat cavalry, but spears vs pikes is pure randomness, depending will pike bug-out or lose moral etc.